JOHN J. STEPHENS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. State, 367 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 1979)
  …48 So. 2d 756 (Fla.1950); Edwards v. State, 155 Fla. 550, 20 So. 2d 916 (1945); Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229, 114 So. 244 (1927); Roberts v. State, 94 Fla. 149, 113 So. 726 (1927); Mumford v. State, 70 Fla. 424, 70 So. 399 (1915); Sumpter v. State, 45 Fla. 106, 33 So. 981 (1903). Additionally, this Court long ago recognized that the special circumstances of custodial interrogation could affect the reliability of admissions by silence. Dedge v. State, 128 Fla. 343, 174 So. 725 (1937). . See Doyle v. Ohio,…
• Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229 (Fla. 1927)
  …ulness of the charges made against him.” The rule just stated, and its exceptions, have been approved in effect by this Court. See Mumford v. State, 70 Fla. 424, 70 South. Rep. 399; Salon v. State, 70 Fla. 622, 70 South. Rep. 603; Sumpter v. State, 45 Fla. 106, 33 South. Rep. 981. See also Vaughn v. State (Ala.), 30 South. Rep. 669; Jackson v. State (Ala.), 52 South. Rep. 835; People v. Amaya, 66 Pac. Rep. 794; State v. Lovell, 138 S. W. Rep. 523; 16 C. J. 631 (1256), and cases cited. Of course, the promp…
• Phillips v. State, 177 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
  …0, 20 So. 2d 916 (1945); Handley v. State, 125 Fla. 632, 170 So. 748 (1936); Autrey v. State, 94 Fla. 229, 114 So. 244 (1927); Roberts v. State, 94 Fla. 149, 113 So. 726 (1927); Mumford v. State, 70 Fla. 424, 70 So. 399 (1915); and Sumpter v. State, 45 Fla. 106, 33 So. 981 (1903). See also: Anno. 80 A.L.R. 1235. The judgment appealed is Affirmed. WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., J., concur.…