JOE SAVAGE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Trans Atl. Distribs., L.P. v. Whiland Co., S.A., 671 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …but we do not. That interpretation renders those three words redundant and superfluous. We believe the reference contemplates that the defendant ultimately prevails in the replevin action. See Gimbel v. International Mailing and Printing Co., Inc., 506 So. 2d 1081, 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (section 78.20 is merely a make-whole provision for defendants who prevail in re-plevin actions and meet other criteria of entitlement) (emphasis supplied). In agreeing with the Fourth District’s interpretation of section…
• Jussi K. Kivisto v. Gmac LLC, 978 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …ges were due immediately upon the dissolving of the writ. Prior to McMurrain, this court had construed section 78.20, Florida Statutes (2007), upon which this issue turns, in a manner contrary to McMur-rain. Gimbel v. Int'l Mailing and Printing Co., 506 So. 2d 1081 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). After McMurrain was decided the fifth district, in Trans Atlantic Distributors, L.P. v. Whiland Co., S.A., 671 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) adopted our holding in Gimbel and disagreed with McMur-rain. We agree that this ord…
• Belvant v. Cohen (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)
  …but we do not. That interpretation renders those three words redundant and superfluous. We believe the reference contemplates that the defendant ultimately prevails in the replevin action. See Gimbel v. International Mailing and Printing Co., Inc., 506 So. 2d 1081, 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (section 78.20 is merely a make-whole provision for defendants who prevail in replevin actions and meet other criteria of entitlement) (emphasis supplied). 6 In McMurrain, the First District notes that the purpose of a pr…

Authorities Cited

• Signorelli v. State, 491 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)