COPPOLA ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
HELEN ALFONE AND ARVIDA REALTY SALES, INC., APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1987-05-13
No. 4-86-1646
ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
506 So. 2d 1180 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Although the language of the case law is somewhat confusing we believe the law of damages, as enunciated by the Florida Supreme Court, authorizes an award of damages to a contractual vendee to include the profit made by the vendor on the sale of the property to a subsequent purchaser even though there is no proof of fraud or bad faith. See Gassner v. Lockett, 101 So. 2d 33 (Fla.1958). We also believe there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court's conclusion that appellant, either by its actions throughout the course of the transaction spanning over two years or in failing to properly invoke its rights, had waived the provisions of the contract making time of the essence. Finally, since the damages involved herein, the deposit and the profit on the subsequent sale, involve amounts determined to have been wrongfully withheld by the appellant from appellee at a date certain in the past, we reject appellant’s claim that interest was not recoverable. See Argonaut Insurance Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Coppola Enters., Inc. v. Alfone, 531 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 1988)
    …[*335] KOGAN, Justice. We review Coppola Enterprises, Inc. v. Alfone, 506 So. 2d 1180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), based upon apparent conflict with Horton v. O’Rourke, 321 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), and Vogel v. VanDiver, 373 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. On April 18,1978, Helen Alf…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw