MARY ALLEN, APPELLANT,
v.
A.M.F., INC., D/B/A UNION MACHINERY DIVISION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-05-19
No. 86-934
Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.
507 So. 2d 178 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed is affirmed on authority of Shaw v. General Motors Corp., 503 So. 2d 362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We herein adopt and certify for review the identical questions posed in Shaw.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Allen v. A.M.F., Inc., 515 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 1987)
    …PER CURIAM. We review Allen v. A.M.F., Inc., 507 So. 2d 178, 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer two certified questions of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified questions are as follows: I. WHETHER THE LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 95.-031(2), FLORIDA STATUTES (1983), ABOL…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw