STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD MARK SACHS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court may base a downward departure from sentencing guidelines on a defendant's lack of a prior criminal record.
The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to two counts of DWI manslaughter, facing a presumptive guidelines range of three to seven years. The trial cour…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Downward Departure From Sentencing Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The state appeals the trial court’s downward departure from the presumptive guidelines sentence. We affirm.
Following defendant Howard M. Sachs’ plea of nolo contendere, the trial court adjudicated him guilty of two counts of DWI manslaughter. Although the guidelines scoresheet indicated a presumptive sentencing range of three to seven years imprisonment, the trial court placed defendant on community control for a period of four years. The trial court provided four written reasons in support of this downward departure. The state’s timely notice of appeal followed.
Only one of the trial court’s written reasons for departure was valid, i.e., that de fendant lacked any prior criminal record. State v. Schoff, 490 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). We are convinced, however, that the trial court would have imposed the same penalty absent consideration of the invalid reasons. See Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla.1985).
We, accordingly, affirm the trial court’s judgment placing defendant on community control. In holding that a trial court may base a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines upon a defendant’s lack of a prior criminal record, we recognize conflict with decisions of our sister courts. See State v. Holcomb, 481 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); State v. Sanders, No. 85-2149 (Fla. 4th DCA Aug. 13,1986) [11 FLW 1783]; State v. Taylor, 482 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
Affirmed.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Sachs, 526 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 1988)…BARKETT, Justice. We have for review State v. Sachs, 507 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), based on certified conflict with State v. Sanders, 512 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), aff'd in pertinent part, 510 So. 2d 296 (Fla.1987), State v. Taylor, 482 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), and State v. Holcomb, 481 So. 2d 1263…
-
Fuller v. State, 509 So. 2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)…ture, we nevertheless affirm the sentence because we are convinced that the judge would have exceeded the recommended range even had this invalid reason been excluded from consideration. Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla.1985); State v. Sachs, 507 So. 2d 708 (Fla.1987) [12 F.L.W. 1260]. Affirmed. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- City OF Atl. Beach v. Bull, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1985)
- Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Taylor, 482 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
- Balarin v. Allstate Ins. Co., 481 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- State v. Schoff, 490 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)