YOUNG MANUFACTURING, INC., APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ROBERT BROOKS, D/B/A HIZ AND MIZ AND HIZ AND MIZ SPORTSWEAR, AND HIZ TENNIS CREATIONS, INC., D/B/A HIZ AND MIZ AND MIZ SPORTSWEAR, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS
PER CURIAM.
Reversing that portion of the trial court’s order pertaining to prejudgment interest and attorney’s fees, we remand the cause to the trial court to award prejudgment interest in accordance with the principles established in Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1985), and Jones Products Corp. v. SAC Constr. Co., 495 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), and to award attorney’s fees pursuant to the rule enunicated in Trustees of Cameron-Brown Inv. Group v. Tavormina, 385 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Contra Alston v. Sundeck Products, Inc., 498 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (trial court not bound by contract between party and attorney in determining fee to be awarded). Cross-appellant/appellee’s remaining point lacks merit. See Henzel v. Golstein, 349 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fernandez v. Fernandez, 648 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 1995)…c to the date of the partial final judgment. The Fourth District Court of Appeal held that such orders were valid. Respondent contends that the Becker case is in conflict with Sahler v. Sahler, 154 Fla. 206, 17 So. 2d 105 (1944), Johnson v. Feeney, 507 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1987), Jaris v. Tucker, 414 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 419 So. 2d 1198 (Fla.1982), and McKendree v. McKendree, 139 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962), which hold that the death of a pa…
-
Marsh & McLennan, Inc. v. Aerolineas Nacionales del Ecuador, 530 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…his own peril.” Fugazy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. State by Dickinson, 188 So. 2d 842, 844 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966). See also State ex rel. Owens v. Pearson, 156 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 1963); Dade County v. Snyder, 134 Fla. 756,184 So. 489 (1938); Johnson v. Feeney, 507 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1987); Wollman v. Levy, 489 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Francisco v. Victoria Marine Shipping, Inc., 486 So. 2d 1386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).5-6 Thus, the order of dismissal for lack of prosecution, al…
-
Reopelle v. Reopelle, 587 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…John’s estate (assuming no one seeks and gains appointment as personal representative of John’s estate) prior to entertaining the motion for rehearing filed by Gloria. VACATED; REMANDED. HARRIS and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur. . In Johnson v. Feeney, 507 So. 2d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1274 (Fla.1987), the third district concluded that the "death of one of the parties to a marriage dissolution action after the entry of judgment but before the trial court rules on a timely motion for rehearing…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Argonaut Ins. Co. v. MAY Plumbing Co., 474 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1985)
- Trs. OF Cameron-Brown Inv. Grp. v. Tavormina, 385 So. 2d 728 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
- Alston v. Sundeck Prods., Inc., 498 So. 2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Henzel v. Golstein, 349 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
- Jones Prods. Corp. v. SAC Constr. Co., Inc., 495 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)