OSCAR ENRIQUE ARCAUTE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Shelburne, 576 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …intervening cause” insulating them from liability as a matter of law is without merit. The cases cited by appellant in support of this proposition, including Dep’t of Transp. v. Anglin, 502 So. 2d 896 (Fla.1987); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Macias, 507 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 518 So. 2d 1276 (Fla.1987); Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lively, 465 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985); and National Airlines, Inc. v. Edwards, 336 So. 2d 545 (Fla.1976), do not persuade.…
• Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC, 39 So. 3d 1216 (Fla. 2010)
  …Dep’t of Transp., 752 So. 2d 30, 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“It is incumbent upon the courts to place limits on foreseeability, lest all remote possibilities be interpreted as foreseeable in the legal sense.” (quoting Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Macias, 507 So. 2d 1113, 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987))); Ransom v. Bethany Acad., No. A07-1769, 2008 WL 3289853 at *2 (Minn.Ct.App. Aug.12, 2008) (“[Ajlthough foreseeability creates a duty of ordinary care, the Minnesota Supreme Court has recognized that there are limits to for…
• Scotty Lamar POE v. IMC Phosphates MP, Inc., 885 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
  …nable care to maintain it in a reasonably safe condition for travel. . The First and Third Districts have both cited section 368 with approval. Scott v. Fla. Dep’t of Transp., 752 So. 2d 30, 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Macias, 507 So. 2d 1113, 1115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). The Supreme Court of Florida has acknowledged the rule stated in section 368 without expressly adopting it. Whitt v. Silverman, 788 So. 2d 210, 215 (Fla.2001).…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Hunwick, 446 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)