ESTELA M. HARP AND JEFFREY HARP, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
v.
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, D/B/A DESERET RANCHES OF FLORIDA, INC., WILLIAM MILLER, AND BREVARD CYCLE SPORTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
ESTELA M. HARP AND JEFFREY HARP, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS,
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, D/B/A DESERET RANCHES OF FLORIDA, INC., WILLIAM MILLER, AND BREVARD CYCLE SPORTS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
508 So. 2d 48
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a non-final order, transferring a personal injury action from Indian River County to Osceola County. We affirm, having concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the change of venue sought by a defendant pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1985). See Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Hu v. Crockett, 426 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Bingham v. Manson, 363 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). See also Levy v. Hawk’s Cay, Inc., 505 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and cases cited therein.
LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Desmond B. Larmer v. State, 522 So. 2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…, however, cannot sweep away legitimate arguments which militate against the enforcement of a wooden rule. The previous holding of this court that one arrested for DUI cannot refuse a breathalyzer test because of a right to counsel, Nelson v. State, 508 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), is not dispositive of this case. What is involved here is whether that individual, after refusing to take the test, can rescind that decision and avoid the penalty for refusal; and if so, upon what conditions. On these issues r…
-
Kurecka v. State, 67 So. 3d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…dard of review to the court’s application of the law to the facts. Id. It is well-settled in Florida that a person arrested for DUI does not have the right to consult with counsel before deciding whether to submit to a breath test. Nelson v. State, 508 So. 2d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (citing State v. Hoch, 500 So. 2d 597, 599-600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (holding that (1) administration of a breath test is not a critical stage of the proceedings to which a Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches; (2) the resu…
-
Philippe Serge Langelier v. Gerry Coleman, 861 F.2d 1508 (11th Cir. 1988)….E. 2d 925 (Athens Co.Mun.Ct.1973); Bunten v. Motor Vehicles Division, State of Oregon, 55 Or.App. 515, 639 P. 2d 135 (1982). We note, however, that Florida courts have declined to find such a right. Hoch, 500 So. 2d at 600; accord, Nelson v. State, 508 So. 2d 48 (4th DCA 1987). . Langelier misperceives the scope of the first amendment protection afforded speech. The guarantee of free speech is not absolute; the first amendment does not confer upon citizens “an unlimited license to talk.” Konigsberg v. Stat…
Authorities Cited
- Stephen C.S. HU v. Crockett, 426 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Tucker v. Chantal Fianson, 484 So. 2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
- Bingham v. Manson, 363 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
- Levy v. Hawk's CAY, Inc., 505 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)