RANDY EUGENE KINCHEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDY EUGENE KINCHEN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
508 So. 2d 51
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Marshall, 476 So. 2d 150 (Fla.1985); Lusk v. State, 446 So. 2d 1038 (Fla.1984); and McCray v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla.1982). As we recently did in Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), we certify the following as a question of great public importance:
IS IT NECESSARY, IN EVALUATING AN ASSERTION OF HARMLESS ERROR IN A CRIMINAL APPEAL, THAT EACH APPELLATE JUDGE INDEPENDENTLY READ THE COMPLETE TRIAL RECORD? HERSEY, C.J., concurs in result only.
ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Lusk v. State, 446 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Marshall, 476 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1985)
- Ervin McCRAY v. State, 416 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1982)
- Ciccarelli v. State, 508 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)