PETER A. MEREDITH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1987-06-03
No. 4-86-0313
HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
508 So. 2d 473 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987) Negative Treatment
Cited by 5 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand with instructions to allow Peter A. Meredith to withdraw his plea to first degree murder and to proceed to trial.

We do this because the trial court should not have accepted the defendant’s plea without first determining whether there was a factual basis for the plea. See Rule 3.172(a), Fla.R.Crim.P.; Maselli v. State, 446 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1984); and Dydek v. State, 400 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Such determination was not adequately made and this resulted in manifest injustice to the defendant. The material in the file upon which the trial court relied reflects a lack of the essential element of premeditation and, hence, there is no factual basis for the charge of first degree murder. Reversed and Remanded.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 534 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
    …ence or proffer of evidence by either the state or the defense. Before accepting a guilty plea, a trial court is required to satisfy itself that there is a factual basis for the plea. Williams v. State, 316 So. 2d 267 (Fla.1975); Meredith v. State, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Dydek v. State, 400 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(a). Generally, the rule may be complied with by receiving evidence, testimony, a proffer of evidence, statements by counsel or the defendant, or reference t…
  • Saud Tarawneh and Ghada Tarawneh v. State, 562 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
    …their conspiracy in Florida to provide jurisdiction in this state under Florida Statutes Section 910.005. Cf. United States v. Petit, 841 F. 2d 1546 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1237, 108 S.Ct. 2906, 101 L.Ed.2d 938 (1988); State v. Saunders, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 519 So. 2d 988 (Fla.1987); State v. Cristodero, 426 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 436 So. 2d 100 (Fla.1983). See also Cummings v. State, 514 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); State v. Bass, 451 So. 2d 986 (F…
  • State v. Ludwig Velarde Ruiz, 909 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …ould not be appropriate because the evidence which would be presented at trial would establish the crime of attempt, as well as the crime of solicitation. This argument possessed merit and is an alternative basis for reversal. See State v. Saunders, 508 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(holding that section 910.005(l)(b) of the Florida Statutes, providing in part that a person is subject to prosecution in State for an offense that he committed while either within or outside State if the conduct outside State con…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw