ROLF E. WESTERSTROM, APPELLANT,
v.
REDCLIFF PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLEE
ROLF E. WESTERSTROM, APPELLANT,
REDCLIFF PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLEE
508 So. 2d 482
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)
Caution
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court’s order granting Redcliff Properties, Inc. (Redcliff) summary judgment because there remains a disputed issue of fact. Whether Redcliff retook possession of the property for its own account or for the account of Wester-strom is an unresolved and material issue of fact precluding summary judgment. See Hyman v. Cohen, 73 So. 2d 393 (Fla.1954); Wolf v. Buchman, 425 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Diehl v. Gibbs, 173 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965). Accordingly, the summary judgment under review is reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Valdes-Fauli v. Gonzalo F. Valdes-Fauli, 903 So. 2d 214 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…y, 781 So. 2d 1063, 1065 (Fla.2000); Shah v. Harding, 839 So. 2d 765, 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Loevinger v. Northrup, 624 So. 2d 374, 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Stimpson Computing Scale Co., Inc. a Div. of Globe [*218] Slicing Mach. Co., Inc. v. Knuck, 508 So. 2d 482, 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)(It is well settled that “[a] judge faced with a motion for recusal should first resolve that motion before making additional rulings in a case.... [A] recusal motion must be heard first.”). The granting of the continuance aft…
-
Breakstone v. Honorable Mary Ann MacKENZIE, 561 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…ial judge had impermis-sibly passed on the truth of the facts alleged, thus providing additional grounds for disqualification. We agree. See Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.432(d); Bundy v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440, 442 (Fla.1978); Stimpson Computing Scale Co. v. Knuck, 508 So. 2d 482, 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); State ex rel. Allen v. Testa, 414 So. 2d 38, 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Management Corp. of America v. Grossman, 396 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The second motion for disqualification, like the first, should have been grante…
-
Cyril Hanna v. Indus. Labor Serv., Inc., 636 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…CA 1967). Under these peculiar circumstances, and given the uncertainties in the record and the deficiencies in the order, we can discern no basis for the drastic sanction of dismissal for non-appearance. Stimpson Computing Scale Co., Inc. v. Knuck, 508 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (tardy production of document linking party to product in products liability action did not warrant dismissal of action and entry of default); Wallraff v. T.G.I. Friday’s, Inc., 490 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1986); Besco Equipment Co., Inc.…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hyman v. Cohen, 73 So. 2d 393 (Fla. 1954)
- Maounis v. Igor Shamis (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
- Wolf v. Buchman, 425 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- O'Neill D. Diehl v. Robert Louis Gibbs et ux., 173 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)