JEAN CROKER MCMILLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER R. ROGERS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT V. CROKER, APPELLEE
LEHAN, Judge.
We affirm the trial court’s order striking a petition for an interim accounting by the personal representative of an estate. The petition was filed by a beneficiary of a trust which was to receive assets from the estate.
Under the circumstances of this case we need not rule on the issue as to whether the petitioner had standing as an “interested party” under Florida Rules of Probate & Guardianship Procedure 5.150(b) to seek the accounting, an issue as to which there are arguments pro and con. The trial judge indicated that he saw no need for an accounting at that time, and no showing has been made otherwise. Whether or not petitioner had standing, the trial judge evidently would not have ordered an interim accounting, and he was not required to do so. Id. Cf. Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.345. Thus, we do not conclude that, even if petitioner did have standing, there was reversible error. Affirmed.
DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Earsley Wilcher v. State, 524 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)…the error was preserved for review. Two other points are conceded by the State: (1) victim injury points cannot be added to the scoresheet if injury is not an element of the crime, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(7); Camerron v. State, 508 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and (2) the written sentence does not conform to the sentence announced in court and should be corrected on remand, Toombs v. State, 404 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 412 So. 2d 471 (Fla.1982). The conviction an…