TONY CAMERRON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-06-23
No. 86-2388
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
508 So. 2d 570 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes error in the trial court’s inclusion of victim injury points in scoring the robbery conviction when physical contact does not constitute an element of the crime. Vaillant v. State, 490 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. See also Byrd v. State, 503 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (victim injury may not be scored because not element of robbery); Vega v. State, 498 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (same); Ritts v. State, 491 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (same); Wright v. State, 487 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (victim injury not a necessary element of armed robbery). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. Appellant’s remaining point lacks merit. Phillips v. State, 476 So. 2d 194 (Fla.1985).

Conviction affirmed, sentence vacated, and remanded for resentencing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw