ROOSEVELT SIGLER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROOSEVELT SIGLER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
508 So. 2d 574
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Caution
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse on the authority of Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla.1971), and remand for a new trial.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
ANSTEAD, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Vista Designs, Inc. v. Melvin K. Silverman, P.C., 774 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…riting, was a void contract ab initio.” Thus, Silverman was to take nothing on his action for unpaid legal bills. In ruling against Vista Designs’ on its counterclaim, the trial court held that it was “persuaded by the holding in Bedell v. Marshall, 508 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) that this court is not permitted to order the disgorgement of money paid under a void contract.” Bedell2 held that a plaintiff may not recover real estate commissions paid to an unlicensed agent under a void contract. Bedell is d…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 1971)