MINTRA RAGOONATH, PETITIONER,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL.

U.S. | 2014-06-23
No. 13–1083.
134 S. Ct. 2840 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 189 L. Ed. 2d 806 · 82 U.S.L.W. 3731
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Murphy v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, 138 S. Ct. 1461 (U.S. 2018)
  • Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration AND Customs Enforcement, 818 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2016)
    …Gahey, “securing an alien while awaiting [his removal hearing] constitutes an action taken to commence proceedings.” 709 F. 3d 1062, 1065 (11th Cir.), suggestion for reh’g en banc denied, 737 F. 3d 694 (2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2840, 189 L.Ed.2d 806 (2014), In Gupta, a removable alien argued that federal agents “illegally procured an arrest warrant, that the agents illegally arrested him, and that the agents illegally detained him,” Id. We found that § 1252(g) barred us' from reaching ■ the mer…
  • Whitfield v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 785 (U.S. 2015)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw