CARL ST. PREUX, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• Zelaya v. United States, 781 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …rcuit has held that the statute of limitations applicable to the FTCA, 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b), is not jurisdictional. Kwai Fun Wong v. Beebe, 732 F. 3d 1030, 1044 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc), cert. granted sub nom. United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2873, 189 L.Ed.2d 831 (June 30, 2014) (decision pending). In Kwai Fun Wong, the Ninth Circuit made clear that it was expressing no view on the jurisdictional status of the chapter 171 provisions of Title 28. Id. at 1044 n. 10. However, in the wake of…
• United States v. Kwai FUN Wong. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1625 (U.S. 2015)
  …it reversed in light of its recent decision in Wong,thus holding that § 2401(b)'s 2-year deadline, like its 6-month counterpart, is not jurisdictional and may be tolled. 550 Fed.Appx. 505 (2013). We granted certiorari in both cases, 573 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2873, 189 L.Ed.2d 831, 832 (2014), to resolve a circuit split about whether courts may equitably toll § 2401(b)'s two time limits. Compare, e.g., In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Prods. Liability Litigation,646 F.3d 185, 190-191 (C.A.5 2011)(per curiam) (…
• Moones Mellouli v. Lynch, 135 S. Ct. 1980 (U.S. 2015)
  …ce Center et al. as Amici Curiae 7. At most, it is a low-level infraction, often not attended by a right to counsel. Id., at 9-11. The Eighth Circuit denied Mellouli's petition for review. 719 F.3d 995 (2013). We granted certiorari, 573 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 2873, 189 L.Ed.2d 831 (2014), and now reverse the judgment of the Eighth Circuit. II We address first the rationale offered by the BIA and affirmed by the Eighth Circuit, which differentiates paraphernalia offenses from possession and distribution offens…