EARL RINGO, PETITIONER,
v.
DONALD ROPER, WARDEN.

U.S. | 2014-09-09
No. 14–6169 14A267.
135 S. Ct. 40 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 135 S. Ct. 41 · 189 L. Ed. 2d 892
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
Justice SOTOMAYORwould grant the application for stay of execution.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice ALITO and by him referred to the Court denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYORwould grant the application for stay of execution.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …challenge its conformity with the Eighth Amendment— does not substitute for the identification of a cognizable liberty interest.’” (citations omitted)); Trottie v. Livingston, 766 F. 3d 450, 452 (5th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 41, 189 L.Ed.2d 892 (2014) (“A due process right to disclosure requires an inmate to show a cognizable liberty interest in obtaining information about execution protocols. Trottie speculates that there are unknowns regarding the drug to be used which may add an unaccep…
  • …challenge its conformity with the Eighth Amendment— does not substitute for the identification of a cognizable liberty interest.’ ” (citations omitted)); Trottie v. Livingston, 766 F. 3d 450, 452 (5th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 41, 189 L.Ed.2d 892 (2014) (“A due process right to disclosure requires an inmate to show a cognizable liberty interest in obtaining information about execution protocols. Trottie speculates that there are unknowns regarding the drug to be used which may add an unaccep…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw