ASHLEY L. MARKESON, PETITIONER,
v.
VIRGINIA PAYNE.
ASHLEY L. MARKESON, PETITIONER,
VIRGINIA PAYNE.
135 S. Ct. 67
Supreme Court of the United States (2014)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 190 L. Ed. 2d 34
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landers v. Warden, The Attorney Gen. OF the State of Ala., 776 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2015)…that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt.’ ” Bishop v. Warden, GDCP, 726 F. 3d 1243, 1253 (11th Cir.2013) (quoting Renico v. Lett, 559 U.S. 766, 773, 130 S.Ct. 1855, 176 L.Ed.2d 678 (2010)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 67, 190 L.Ed.2d 34 (2014). Under § 2254(d)(2), “[t]he question ... is not whether a federal court believes the state court’s determination was incorrect but whether that determination was unreasonable — a substantially higher threshold.” Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.…
-
French v. Warden, Wilcox State Prison, Attorney Gen., State of Ga., 790 F.3d 1259 (11th Cir. 2015)…ED-PA”), which “imposes a highly deferential standard for evaluating state court rulings and demands that state-court decisions be given the benefit of the doubt.” Bishop v. Warden, GDCP, 726 F. 3d 1243, 1253 (11th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 67, 190 L.Ed.2d 34 (2014) (internal quotation omitted). Pursuant to the AED-PA, this Court is prohibited from granting relief if a state court has adjudicated a claim on the merits unless the state court’s decision “was contrary to, or involved an unr…