SHAW NURSERY & LANDSCAPE COMPANY, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

SAMUEL B. CRISPIN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Curtis v. Bordo Citrus Prods. & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 566 So. 2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …e reason that there is no evidentiary basis upon which to measure appellant’s entitlement to wage loss benefits, which are intended to compensate the claimant for actual wage loss resulting from a permanent impairment. R.E. Dailey Company v. Dorman, 509 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Section 440.15(3)(b). The claimant typically, but not necessarily, demonstrates the extent of the loss as well as the causal connection by testing his employability through a work search. Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Construction, 52…
• Walker v. City OF Tampa, 520 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …oted that section 440.15(9) is “applicable only to permanent total disability benefits,” and not to [*68] an award of temporary total disability benefits for the period of time during which the claimant was in prison); R.E. Dailey Company v. Dorman, 509 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (wherein this Court reiterated that temporary partial disability and wage-loss benefits are based on actual wage-loss, and on that basis reversed the award of benefits during the time that claimant was incarcerated since he “clea…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Uss Agri-Chemicals v. Waddell, 537 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 1989)
  …laims of Bonner and Waddell. Bonner was incarcerated in excess of two years and received no wage-loss benefits for over two years because a prisoner is not entitled to wage-loss benefits during the time he is incarcerated. R.E. Dailey Co. v. Dorman, 509 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Waddell worked part of the two years in question at a wage greater than the wage he received at the time of his injury, but he lost that job.3 He thereafter served a few months in jail, looked for work after discharge, sought wa…

Authorities Cited

• Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1959)