VANDROTH BACKUS, ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Walls v. State, 213 So. 3d 340 (Fla. 2016)
  …lows: 102 at age 12, 101 at age 14, 72 at about age 23, and 74 at approximately age 40. . See In re Hill, 777 F. 3d 1214, 1223 (11th Cir.2015); In re Henry, 757 F. 3d 1151, 1159 (11th Cir.2014). . In Haliburton v. Florida, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 178, 190 L.Ed.2d 8 (2014), the United States Supreme Court remanded the defendant’s intellectual disability claim to this Court for reconsideration in light of Hall. On remand, this Court remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing under rule 3.203. Halibur…
• In re Hill, 777 F.3d 1214 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …014, the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari to a successive capital habeas petitioner, vacated the Florida Supreme Court’s judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Hall. See Haliburton v. Florida, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 178, 190 L.Ed.2d 8 (2014). I can think of no reason for the Supreme Court to remand a case like Haliburton, arising as it did in the context of a successive habeas application, unless it intended for Hall to apply retroactively. The Supreme Court does not “create ne…