PATRICIA MANTO, APPELLANT,
v.
ANTHONY MANTO, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tenancy In Common cases and more on FLexlaw
FRANK, Judge.
The appellant, Patricia Manto, disputes the trial court’s failure to incorporate in the final judgment the disposition of a $25,000 second mortgage placed upon the marital home. The proceeds of the mortgage appear to have been or are being used by the ex-husband in connection with the maintenance and operation of a business venture. The ex-wife and ex-husband are now tenants in common in the marital home. We, therefore, remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of an amended final judgment in which it is provided that upon the sale of the marital home the second mortgage is to be satisfied from the husband’s share of the proceeds. See Pace v. Pace, 427 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). In all other respects the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1985).
SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moore v. Moore, 543 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)…e more favorable judgment being reviewed. Only if we find an abuse of discretion by the trial court should we reverse. See Diffenderfer v. Diffenderfer, 491 So. 2d 265 (Fla.1986); [*254] Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So. 2d 542 (Fla.1985); Manto v. Manto, 509 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Murphy v. Murphy, 475 So. 2d 1253, 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Brown v. Brown, 472 So. 2d 873, 875 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Marlow v. Marlow, 464 So. 2d 717, 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The trial court has a very broad ambit of discretion i…
Authorities Cited
- Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So. 2d 542 (Fla. 1985)
- Schwartz v. Schwartz, 427 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)