FRANK BOVINO AND MARILYN BOVINO, APPELLANTS,
v.
MCDONALDS CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
FRANK BOVINO AND MARILYN BOVINO, APPELLANTS,
MCDONALDS CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
509 So. 2d 991
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We cite, with approval, the language of Smith v. Markowitz, 486 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 494 So. 2d 1153 (Fla.1986), and affirm this cause upon the authority of that case. Policemen, while discharging their duties, are subject to the Firemen’s Rule. True, there are exceptions to that rule, but none of them are present in the case at bar. AFFIRMED.
HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Donaldson v. State, 537 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Winters v. State, 500 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), approved, 522 So. 2d 816 (Fla.1988); White v. State, 481 So. 2d 1258 (Fla.2d DCA 1986); see also Wilson v. State, 509 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).…
Authorities Cited
- Smith v. Markowitz, 486 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)