LOUIS PATINO, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
THE CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
LOUIS PATINO, ETC., APPELLANT,
THE CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
509 So. 2d 1161
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Coggins v. Clark Equipment Company, 503 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Pait v. Ford Motor Company, 500 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).
UPCHURCH, C.J. and SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Devine v. State, 120 So. 3d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…delivered to the court and prosecutors on September 7, 2010. “The prisoner has the initial burden of making a written request for final disposition, and upon so doing the state has the burden to bring him to trial within 180 days.” State v. Edwards, 509 So. 2d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Having lodged a detainer but failing thereafter to act in the face of the IAD request, the State failed to timely bring Devine to trial. For this reason, Devine was entitled to a dismissal of the Florida burglary charge. A…
-
Wray Dawes v. State, 135 So. 3d 420 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…ether a one-year sentence in a county jail is “a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution of a party state,” as those terms are used in Article III of the IADA. Federal law governs the interpretation of the IADA, State v. Edwards, 509 So. 2d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), which states it is to be “liberally construed so as to effectuate its purposes.” § 941.45(IX), Fla. Stat. (2011). Neither the term “imprisonment” or the phrase “penal or correctional institution of a party state” is defin…
Authorities Cited
- Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 500 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)
- Coggins v. Clark Equip. Co., 503 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)