LEONARDO PORTILLO-VEGA, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2014-10-14
No. 14–6157.
135 S. Ct. 389 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 190 L. Ed. 2d 274
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Carter, 776 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2015)
    …is deemed abandoned.”). Because he has “abandoned an issue on which he had to prevail in order to obtain reversal” on hearsay grounds, his hearsay argument fails. See United States v. King, 751 F. 3d 1268, 1277 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 389, 190 L.Ed.2d 275 (2014). Turning to Carter’s Confrontation Clause argument, we first note the Confrontation Clause prohibits the admission of a declarant’s out-of-court testimonial statements unless the declarant was unavailable and the defendant h…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw