CASSANDRA DURANT, PETITIONER,
v.
THE HONORABLE EDDIE BOONE, SHERIFF OF LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A witness in a rape trial was cited for contempt of court and jailed after allegedly committing perjury. The court granted her habeas corpus petition, finding that the judge failed to comply with Florida's mandatory procedural requirements for criminal contempt proceedings.
No. The trial judge violated Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 by failing to follow mandatory procedures, and therefore the contempt order was unlawful. The petitioner was entitled to a writ of habeas corpus requiring her immediate release from custody.
[1] A writ of habeas corpus is appropriate when a person is detained pursuant to an unlawfully entered order of criminal contempt.
[2] Direct criminal contempt proceedings must strictly adhere to the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 to comply with constitutional due pro…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 governs proceedings in cases of direct criminal contempt. It requires, among other things, that the judge inquire of the accused whether he has any cause to show why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt and it requires that the accused be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances.”
Establishes the mandatory procedural requirements for criminal contempt proceedings
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligencePetitioner testified as the complaining witness in a rape trial. On cross-examination, she admitted a prior conviction for aggravated assault. On redi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Direct Criminal Contempt cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus alleging that she was being detained by respondent pursuant to an unlawfully entered order of criminal contempt. The actions giving rise to this petition occurred on July 6, 1987, with the petition being filed on July 8, 1987. Pursuant to an order of this court, a response was filed the following day. The response did not contest the factual allegations of the petition, but suggested that the petition should be denied on technical grounds. After consideration of the response, the petition was granted and petitioner was ordered released. This opinion follows.
Petitioner was the state’s complaining witness in a rape trial being conducted before Circuit Court Judge Charles McClure. On cross examination, defense counsel asked Petitioner whether she had previously been convicted of a felony. Petitioner admitted that she had plead nolo contendere to an aggravated assault charge and been convicted. On redirect examination by the state attorney, Petitioner was asked to explain the circumstances of the conviction. Petitioner explained that the charges accused her of firing a pistol at her former boyfriend, but that she did not really have a gun, that the bullet holes in her boyfriend’s car predated the incident, and that she had merely set off some fireworks.
During the lunch recess, the Assistant State Attorney urged petitioner to recant her testimony which he believed to be false. After the recess, Petitioner was recalled, and admitted that she had fired a pistol at her boyfriend. She said she told the false story because it was the same as the original story she had told the police when she was first arrested on the assault charge.
Late in the afternoon of July 6, the jury acquitted the defendant on the sexual battery charge. Before excusing the jury, Judge McClure called petitioner before him, and announced that she was in contempt of court for perjury. He sentenced her to 30 days in jail, and petitioner was immediately taken into custody.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 governs proceedings in cases of direct criminal contempt. It requires, among other things, that the judge inquire of the accused whether he has any cause to show why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt and it requires that the accused be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances. The rule also requires entry of a signed, written order containing a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. Fisher v. State, 482 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Strict adherence to the procedures of Rule 3.830 is mandated to ensure compliance with constitutional due process requirements. Id.; Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1977). When the procedures of the rule are not complied with, habeas corpus is appropriate. Carter v. Easterling, 362 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Because the procedural requirements of Rule 3.830 were not followed, petitioner was being detained pursuant to an unlawful order, and was entitled to the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus, requiring her immediate release from custody-
JOANOS, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Blalock v. Rice, 707 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)…contempt in a domestic relations matter. We have jurisdiction. See Pompey v. Cochran, 685 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Roundtree v. Felton, 656 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Jackson v. State, 562 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Durant v. Boone, 509 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). At the time this petition was filed, Blalock had already served almost two months of a sixteen-month sentence. Her plight was brought to the attention of an Assistant Public Defender by jail personnel who were confounded by a c…
-
Guardado v. Guardado, 813 So. 2d 236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…onclude that they are direct criminal contempt orders. See Carnival Corp. v. Beverly, 744 So. 2d 489, 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 governs proceedings in cases of direct criminal contempt. Durant v. [*237] Boone, 509 So. 2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Scrupulous compliance with rule 3.830 is required. Carnival Corp., 744 So. 2d at 497. Rule 3.830 requires entry of a signed, written order containing a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. Th…
-
Jones v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 48 So. 3d 704 (Fla. 2010)…t for civil contempt); MacNeil v. State, 586 So. 2d 98, 99 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (involuntary commitment for mental illness); Lee v. State, 546 So. 2d 436, 436 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (involuntary commitment for treatment for alcoholism); Durant v. Boone, 509 So. 2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (procedural validity of contempt order). The Parole Commission also attempts to advance the federal system’s acceptance of a legislatively created statute of limitation on habeas corpus actions as justification for denying…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Rocco Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So. 2d 422 (Fla. 1977)
- Fisher v. State, 482 So. 2d 587 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
- Carter v. Tullis Easterling, 362 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)