CHUNON L. BAILEY, AKA POLO, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2014-12-01
No. 13–1521.
135 S. Ct. 705 Supreme Court of the United States (2014) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 190 L. Ed. 2d 461
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Justice SOTOMAYORtook no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Justice SOTOMAYORtook no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Durham, 795 F.3d 1329 (11th Cir. 2015)
    …3d 1273 (11th Cir.2005); United States v. Ardley, 273 F. 3d 991, 991-95 (11th Cir.2001) (Carnes, J., concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc). And there are some reasons not to have such a rule. See, e.g., Joseph v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 705, 706, 190 L.Ed.2d 461 (2014) (Kagan, J., respecting the denial of certiorari); United States v. Higdon, 418 F. 3d 1136, 1148-51 (11th Cir.2005) (Tjoflat, J., dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc); Ardley, 273 F. 3d at 996-1007 (Tjoflat, J…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw