JEROME WESTFIELD DEWALD, PETITIONER,

v.

MICHIGAN.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Quartavious Davis, 785 F.3d 498 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …tates v. Davis, 573 Fed.Appx. 925 (11th Cir.2014). II. STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court reviews de novo constitutional challenges to a federal statute. United States v. Campbell, 743 F. 3d 802, 805 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 135 S.Ct. 704, 190 L.Ed.2d 438 (2014). We review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. United States v. Jordan, 635 F. 3d 1181, 1185 (11th Cir.2011). In the context of an appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, all facts…
• United States v. Carlington Cruickshank, 837 F.3d 1182 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …plication of a statute concerning its subject-matter jurisdiction de novo, but we review factual findings with respect to jurisdiction for clear error. United States v. Campbell, 743 F. 3d 802, 805 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 704, 190 L.Ed.2d 438 (2014). We review the legal question of whether a statute is constitutional and constitutional objections de novo. Id. Under our prior precedent rule, we are bound to follow a prior binding precedent unless and until it is overruled by us sitting e…
• United States v. Wilchcombe, 838 F.3d 1179 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …Clause because it does not require proof of a nexus between the United States and a defendant. Because we have previously rejected this argument, United States v. Campbell, 743 F. 3d 802, 810 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 704, 190 L.Ed.2d 438 (2014), they seek en banc review. We cannot reconsider this issue, nor do we support en banc review. The text of the MDLEA does not require a nexus between the defendants and the United States; it specifically provides that its prohibitions on drug…