B. F. PATTON AND WIFE, PEARL S. PATTON, APPELLANTS,
v.
H. E. MEDDICK, FREDDIE LEIGH WILDER, JOINED BY GUSS WILDER, HER HUSBAND, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1932-03-04
104 Fla. 398 Florida Supreme Court (1932) Caution
Also reported at: 139 So. 880
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

—This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said decrees. The cause having been heretofore before this Court from an order and decree overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, Patton v. Meddick, 97 Fla. 1073, 122 So. 710, and affirmed. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the decrees- of the Circuit Court be and they are hereby affirmed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., and Johnson, Circuit Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miami Bridge Co. v. R.R. Comm'n of the State of Fla., 155 Fla. 366 (Fla. 1944)
    …nableness of the rate as fixed by this instrumentality can or may by the courts be reviewed or inquired into when presented in an appropriate proceeding. See Miami Bridge Co. v. Miami Beach Ry. Co., supra; Day v. City of St. Augustine, 104 Fla. 261, 139 So. 880; Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commissioners, 100 Fla. 538, 129 So. 876; State ex rel. Young v. Duval County, 76 Fla. 180, 79 So. 692. Substantial portions of petitioner’s fifth plea are set forth sufra. Additional thereto it is alleged tha…
  • Taylor v. LEE Cnty., 498 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 1986)
    …unty. Taylor argues that it is the sole prerogative of the state to impose and regulate tolls and that tolls cannot be imposed without express authority of the state. The cited authority for this claim is Day v. City of St. Augustine, 104 Fla. 261, 139 So. 880 (1932), in which this Court held that the state legislature has almost absolute power with respect to toll bridges and may vest that power in other appropriate entities. Years after Day the legislature amended chapter 125 to enlarge the powers of co…
  • N. Dade Water Co. v. Fla. State Tpk. Auth., 114 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
    …minent domain over the same land in behalf of another corporation. * * * ” 2 Nichols, Eminent Domain, § 5.75[4] (3d ed. 1950). See, also, [*461] Ex parte Marshall, 75 Fla. 97, 77 So. 869, L.R.A.1918C, 944; Day v. City of St. Augustine, 104 Fla. 261, 139 So. 880; State ex rel. Watkins v. Fernandez, 106 Fla. 779, 143 So. 638, 86 A.L.R. 240; 14 Fla.Jur., Franchises, § 2 et seq.; 10 F.L.P., Franchises, §§ 2, 3; 3 Powell, Real Property, §§ 432, 433; 1 Thompson, Real Property, § 308 (2d ed. 1939). It is settled…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw