THOMAS T. PROUSALIS, JR., PETITIONER,

v.

CHARLES E. MOORE.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Farias, 836 F.3d 1315 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …§ 371. Thus, to be timely, the superseding indictment had to be returned within five years of the last alleged overt act, which occurred on April 2, 2009. See United States v. Isaacson, 752 F. 3d 1291, 1302 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 990, 190 L.Ed.2d 869 (2015). The initial indictment was returned on July 21, 2013, which fell squarely within the five-year limitations period. Although the original indictment was sealed, “the government may properly request the sealing of an indictm…
• United States v. Asante, 782 F.3d 639 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …the burden of introducing sufficient and reliable evidence to prove the necessary facts by a preponderance of the evidence.” United States v. Isaacson, 752 F. 3d 1291, 1305 (11th Cir.2014) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 990, 190 L.Ed.2d 869 (2015). This court reviews the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error. See id. 1. Evidence before the sentencing court The evidence before the sentencing court in…