YOUNG INDUSTRIES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION AND ALBERT M. HOCHSTADT, APPELLANTS,

v.

UNION UNDERWEAR COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Lyles, 576 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1991)
  …) weeks before trial when the Defendant was out on bond, where the Defendant said to Miss Carmony, “Bitch, I’m going to kill ... If I can’t have you no one can ... It ain’t over yet”. Williams v. State, 462 So. 2d 36 (1st DCA 1984); Hall v. State, 510 So. 2d 979 (1st DCA 1987). 2. The Defendant has convictions which cannot be scored on his guideline sheet because the convictions were subsequent to the instant offense. Specifically, the Defendant was convicted of Breach of Peace and Disorderly Intoxication…
• Darrial M. Hall v. State, 530 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …commended guideline range were impermissible. As for the third point, we find no reason to consider this argument because we considered the propriety of the reasons for the guideline departure in the appellant’s previous appeal. See, Hall v. State, 510 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We agree with the appellant that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to resen-tence him. In his initial appeal, the appellant argued that the reasons given for the departure from the guidelines were impermissible. We held that…
• Carter v. State, 704 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
  …the habitualization issue but failed to do so before the supreme court’s decisions explaining the scope of review under Rule 3.800(a). The earliest ease holding that a sentence for a life felony could not be habitualized appears to be Hall v. State, 510 So. 2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 519 So. 2d 987 (Fla.1988). This court agreed in Tucker v. State, 576 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), approved, 595 So. 2d 956 (Fla.1992). Davis and Callaway were not decided until 1995, so defendant had a minimum of…