MAURICE ANTWAUN MCKNIGHT, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• ML Healthcare Servs., LLC v. Publix Super Mkts., Inc., 881 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2018)
  …emedy that should be used sparingly” and only after looking at the evidence “in the light most favorable to its admission.” United States v. Flanders, 752 F. 3d 1317, 1335 (11th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1188, 191 L.Ed.2d 143 (2015), reh’g denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1757, 191 L.Ed.2d 718 (2015). Applying that standard, there simply is no basis for finding that the district court abused its discretion. The potential for prejudice arising from admission…
• United States v. Asante, 782 F.3d 639 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …nd exporting enhancements impermissibly double-counted his involvement in shipping the firearms out of the United States. We review this argument de novo. See United States v. Flanders, 752 F. 3d 1317, 1339 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1188, 191 L.Ed.2d 143 (2015). “Impermissible double counting occurs only when one part of the [Sentencing] Guidelines is applied to increase a defendant’s punishment on account of a kind of harm that has already been fully accounted for by application of…