ANDRE COLE, PETITIONER,

v.

MISSOURI.

Citator

Cited By

• ML Healthcare Servs., LLC v. Publix Super Mkts., Inc., 881 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2018)
  …the light most favorable to its admission.” United States v. Flanders, 752 F. 3d 1317, 1335 (11th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1188, 191 L.Ed.2d 143 (2015), reh’g denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1757, 191 L.Ed.2d 718 (2015). Applying that standard, there simply is no basis for finding that the district court abused its discretion. The potential for prejudice arising from admission of the ML Healthcare evidence is that the evidence might have been considered in…
• United States v. Najam Azmat, 805 F.3d 1018 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …rase “South Florida” during questioning. When the defendant does not object to the propriety of the prosecutor’s statement, we review for plain error only. United States v. Flanders, 752 F. 3d 1317, 1332-33 (11th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1757, 191 L.Ed.2d 718 (2015). In that case, “the defendant must show that (1) an error occurred; (2) the error was plain; (3) it affected his substantial rights; and (4) it seriously affected the fairness of the judicial proceedings.” Id. As to the “w…