RAJAT K. GUPTA, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2015-04-20
No. 14–534.
135 S. Ct. 1841 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Caution
Also reported at: 191 L. Ed. 2d 722
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. ROY, 855 F.3d 1133 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …ched the opposite result, those cases are distinguishable from the present case because none involved a single defendant deprived of his sole counsel. See Sweeney v. United States, 766 F. 3d 857, 858-59 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1841, 191 L.Ed.2d 723 (2015) (mem.); United States v. Raid, 502 F. 3d 43, 44-45 (2d Cir. 2007) (per curiam). In fact, in Raid, there were so many defense attorneys and co-defendants that counsel’s “alleged trial absence” was not “noted anywhere in the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw