BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

RETRACTABLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Foudy v. Indian River Cnty. Sheriff's Off., 845 F.3d 1117 (11th Cir. 2017)
  …umstance. C.f. Hillcrest Prop., LLC v. Pasco Cty., 754 F. 3d 1279, 1281-83 (11th Cir. 2014) (considering whether to apply discovery rule to a facial takings challenge to a zoning ordinance pursuant to § 1983), cert, denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1844, 191 L.Ed.2d 724 (2015). And indeed, though many of our own cases profess adherence to the discovery rule, the constructive knowledge element can cause it to function as an occurrence rule, holding a plaintiff “should have known” about an injury at the moment it o…
• Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (U.S. 2017)
• In re McLEAN v. McLean, 794 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …ohibit the filing of a proof of claim to collect a debt within the bankruptcy process,” even when the debt is in fact unenforceable. Crawford v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 758 F. 3d 1254, 1257, 1261-62 (11th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 1844, 191 L.Ed.2d 724 (2015). This is because the stay ensures only that the bankruptcy court is the exclusive forum in which creditors’ claims are to be resolved, not that every claim will be valid. Indeed, the Bankruptcy Code explicitly contemplates that creditors ma…