STEVEN C. NAUGLE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1987-07-02
No. 69734
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
511 So. 2d 282 Florida Supreme Court (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases


Opinion of the Court
EHRLICH, Justice.

EHRLICH, Justice.

We have for review Naugle v. State, 497 So. 2d 664, 665 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) in which the Second District Court of Appeal certified the following question:

DOES FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.191(b)(1) APPLY TO PERSONS HELD IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CHARGES PENDING IN THIS STATE?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Consistent with our recent decision in State v. Bivona, 496 So. 2d 130 (Fla.1986), the district court below concluded that Rule 3.191(b)(1) does so apply. Accordingly, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Alvarez v. State, 515 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
    …t is the obnoxious thing in its mildest and least repulsive form; but illegitimate and unconstitutional practices get their first footing in that way, namely, by silent approaches and slight deviations from legal modes of procedure. Riley v. State, 511 So. 2d 282, 289 (Fla.1987) [quoting Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616, 635, 6 S.Ct. 524, 535, 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886)]. In light of our holding that the intrusion upon Alvarez was not authorized by Mendenhall and that he was detained without justification under…
  • Pinyan v. State, 523 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …ual must, by his conduct, demonstrate an actual subjective expectation of privacy; and (2) society must be willing to recognize that expectation as reasonable. Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Riley v. State, 511 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1987), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1011, 98 L.Ed.2d 977 (1988). It is well settled that the Fourth Amendment protection of the home extends to the curtilage of a residence, with the extent of the curtilage being determined on the basis…
  • Rowell v. State, 544 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
    …greenhouse and its contents with the naked eye. Aerial photos taken during the flyovers were attached to the affidavit of probable cause for issuance of the warrant, but were not made part of the record on appeal. Appellant relies on Riley v. State, 511 So. 2d 282 (Fla.1987), in which the court found that a helicopter circling and hovering at 400 feet over the defendant’s property to look through an opening in their roof was not permissible air surveillance. The court in Riley noted that aerial observation of…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw