DAVID JOHN MARTIN, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Taylor, 818 F.3d 671 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …ldwin, 774 F. 3d 711, 728, 730 n. 1 (11th Cir.2014) (declining to consider the § 2B1.6 argument because the defendant "failed to present th[e] argument to the district court or raise it in his opening brief”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1882, 191 L.Ed.2d 753 (2015); United States v. Barrington, 648 F. 3d 1178, 1203 (11th Cir.2011) (making no reference to § 2B1.6). Additionally, the various unpublished opinions the parties cite have no precedential value. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F. 3d 1208, 1211 n. 3 (11…
• United States v. Osman, 853 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2017)
  …roper amount or type of restitution shall be resolved by the district court under the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard. 18 U.S.C. § 3664(e); United States v. Baldwin, 774 F. 3d 711, 728 (11th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1882, 191 L.Ed.2d 753 (2015). If the victim subsequently discovers further losses that were not ascertainable at the time of the original restitution order, the victim may petition the court for an amended restitution order within sixty days of the discovery of those l…