WAYMON KIRKLAND, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1987-08-19
No. BP-132
THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
511 So. 2d 441 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in imposing court costs against an indigent defendant.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was convicted of sexual battery and sentenced to prison and probation. The trial court assessed $200 in court costs against him. The defenda…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Judge.

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant, Waymon Kirkland, appeals from a conviction of sexual battery with slight force. We address the issue of whether the trial court erred when it imposed $200 in court costs against Kirkland, who was indigent at the time of his conviction. We reverse.

On July 1, 1986, a jury convicted Kirkland of sexual battery with the use of force not likely to cause serious personal injury. Kirkland was sentenced to nine years in state prison followed by six years of probation. At the sentencing phase of Kirkland’s trial, the court assessed $200 in court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985).

The State concedes that the trial court erred in its assessment of court costs against Kirkland in light of his indigent status. In Lawton v. State, 492 So. 2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), we considered the issue of whether section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985), was intended to impose additional court costs on non-indigent persons only. This court answered that question in the affirmative and reversed the trial court’s imposition of such costs on two insolvent defendants after observing:

The language of this statute is clear and leads to only one meaning: indigency is to be determined at the time of sentencing and those persons found to be indigent must be ordered to serve a term of community service in lieu of the imposition of additional court costs. Noland v. State, 489 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Lawton, 492 So. 2d at 406. We therefore reverse and remand so that Kirkland may be ordered to serve a term of community service “in lieu of the imposition of additional court costs.” Id. We have examined the other issues which Kirkland has raised in this appeal, and find them to be without merit.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Arvey Bass and Mary Ann Bass v. Jones, 533 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  • Milford Levine v. Forrest, 578 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …ospital Corp. of America, 481 So. 2d 1264, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Bay & Gulf Laundry Equipment Co. v. Chateau Tower, Inc., 484 So. 2d 615, 616 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). With regard to defendant Sawyer, we treat the appeal as timely. See Bass v. Jones, 511 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (on motion to dismiss appeal). On the merits, we conclude that the action should not have been dismissed with respect to defendant Sawyer. Plaintiff alleges an oral agreement with defendants which is partially memorialized by a w…
  • Simpson v. Tarmac Am., LLC, 106 So. 3d 87 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …ble order (i.e., an interlocutory order). This Court is authorized to construe the motion for rehearing as directed to the final summary judgment, although prematurely filed. The facts of this case are indistinguishable from those in Bass v. Jones, 511 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). In Bass, the First District Court of Appeal found that a motion for rehearing filed after the entry of an order granting summary judgment but before entry of the final summary judgment was one directed to the final summary judgm…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw