PEDRO MADRIGAL-BARCENAS, PETITIONER,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
PEDRO MADRIGAL-BARCENAS, PETITIONER,
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
135 S. Ct. 2828
Supreme Court of the United States (2015)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 842
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wright v. City OF ST. Petersburg, 833 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2016)…readth challenge is “having to show that all applications of the statute are unconstitutional and having to show that a substantial number of them are”), (emphasis added), vacated on other grounds, Martinez v. United States, — U.S.-, 135 S.Ct. 2798, 192 L.Ed.2d 842 (2015). It follows that Wright’s facial challenge fails. His as applied challenge does not fare any better. Wright contends that Ordinance § 20-30 impinges on First Amendment rights because it restricts his access to a traditional public forum whe…
Authorities Cited
- Moones Mellouli v. Lynch, 135 S. Ct. 1980 (U.S. 2015)