DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
MISSISSIPPI BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS, ET AL.

U.S. | 2015-06-15
No. 13–1496.
135 S. Ct. 2833 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 874
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Antoine Bruce v. Samuels, 136 S. Ct. 627 (U.S. 2016)
    …h a prisoner would pay 20 percent of his monthly income for each case he has filed. Courts of Appeals have divided on which of these two approaches § 1915(b)(2) orders. To resolve the conflict, we granted certiorari. 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2833, 192 L.Ed.2d 874 (2015). We hold that monthly installment payments, like the initial partial payment, are to be assessed on a per-case basis. Nothing in § 1915's current design supports treating a prisoner's second or third action unlike his first lawsuit. I A In…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw