CHERYL WALKER-MCGILL, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL BOARD, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
GRETCHEN S. STUART, ET AL.

U.S. | 2015-06-15
No. 14–1172.
135 S. Ct. 2838 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 887
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
Justice SCALIAdissents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Justice SCALIAdissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wilson v. Sellers, 138 S. Ct. 1188 (U.S. 2018)
  • Wollschlaeger v. Governor of the State OF Fla., 797 F.3d 859 (11th Cir. 2015)
    …Amendment. Laws regulating speech “receive different levels of judicial scrutiny depending on the type of regulation and the justifications and purposes underlying it.” Stuart v. Camnitz, 774 F. 3d 238, 244 (4th Cir.2014), cert. denied, 576 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2838, — L.Ed.2d - (2015). Some statutory restraints on speech-most laws that restrict speech based on its content or viewpoint, for example-receive the “most exacting scrutiny,” Turner Broad. Sys, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 642, 114 S.Ct. 2445, 2459, 1…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw