JOHN A. PACE, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
RUSSELL R. PERRY, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse In Personam Jurisdiction cases and more on FLexlaw
ORFINGER, Judge.
The appellee, as plaintiff, filed an action in equity to set aside a money judgment entered against him several years earlier, alleging that service of process had been insufficient to vest the court with in per-sonam jurisdiction. Along with his answer to that complaint, the appellant filed a counterclaim seeking the identical relief which had been sought in the earlier litigation. In the partial summary judgment which is appealed, the trial court set aside the earlier judgment, leaving the counterclaim for adjudication. Thus, the partial summary judgment is a non-final, non-ap-pealable order, interrelated with the counterclaim that remains for adjudication, which seeks the identical relief afforded appellant in the earlier vacated judgment. See S.L.T. Warehouse Company v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1974); Fetters v. United States Fire Insurance Company, 399 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). The appeal is, therefore,
DISMISSED.
DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In the Interest of T.M.M., 560 So. 2d 805 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…If at the conclusion of the state’s case there was no evidence to support the crime, then as in any other case where the state’s evidence falls short of the necessary prima facie showing, a judgment of acquittal should be entered. Williams v. State, 511 So. 2d 740 (Fla.5th DCA 1987). In the instant ease, the facts are insufficient to support a conviction of resisting arrest without violence because without question no lawful arrest occurred. In State v. Beja, 451 So. 2d 882 (Fla.4th DCA 1984), cause dismisse…
-
Williams v. State, 845 So. 2d 987 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)…nt evidence to establish a prima facie case. In viewing the State’s evidence, all rea [*989] sonable inferences of that evidence are drawn in favor of the State Leonard v. State, 731 So. 2d 712, 717 n. 2 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(citing Williams v. State, 511 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)). Below, evidence was introduced as to the location, size, and wording of the sign. We do not read the statute as requiring the sign to include specific “magic words.” Rather, the statute requires that language of the sign must…
-
Wimbley v. State, 567 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…the police were in lawful execution of a legal duty at the time the alleged offenses took place. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in not submitting the issue of the legality of defendant’s arrest to the jury. See Williams v. State, 511 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Smith v. State, 399 So. 2d 70 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). This error requires reversal for a new trial. We do not agree with appellant that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdicts of the jury. In addition, and to avoid…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Wilmott Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 1974)
- Darwin L. Fetters v. United States Fire Ins. Co., 399 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)