RJR PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
RICHARD G. TATUM, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED.
RJR PENSION INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
RICHARD G. TATUM, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED.
135 S. Ct. 2887
Supreme Court of the United States (2015)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 924
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 136 S. Ct. 936 (U.S. 2016)
-
In re Justice v. United States, 817 F.3d 738 (11th Cir. 2016)…Fahey, 779 F. 3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2015) (“So the question is whether timely filing is a ‘filing requirement’ ... The answer is plainly yes.”); In re Mallo, 714 F. 3d 1313 (10th Cir.2014), cert. denied sub nom. Mallo v. I.R.S., — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2889, 192 L.Ed.2d 924 (2015); In re McCoy, 666 F. 3d 924, 932 (5th Cir.2012) (“Unless it is filed under a ‘safe harbor’ provision similar to § 6020(a), a state income tax return that is filed late under the applicable rionbank-ruptcy state law is not a ‘return’ for bankr…