JOSE GUADALUPE LARA, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.
JOSE GUADALUPE LARA, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES.
135 S. Ct. 2889
Supreme Court of the United States (2015)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 192 L. Ed. 2d 929
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Musacchio v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 709 (U.S. 2016)…t rejected Musacchio's statute-of-limitations defense, concluding that he had "waived" the defense by failing to raise it at trial. Id., at 363, 364. We granted certiorari to resolve two questions that have divided the lower courts. 576 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2889, 192 L.Ed.2d 923 (2015). The first question is whether the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case should be measured against the elements described in the jury instructions where those instructions, without objection, require the Government…
-
In re Justice v. United States, 817 F.3d 738 (11th Cir. 2016)…1986. See In re Fahey, 779 F. 3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2015) (“So the question is whether timely filing is a ‘filing requirement’ ... The answer is plainly yes.”); In re Mallo, 714 F. 3d 1313 (10th Cir.2014), cert. denied sub nom. Mallo v. I.R.S., — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2889, 192 L.Ed.2d 924 (2015); In re McCoy, 666 F. 3d 924, 932 (5th Cir.2012) (“Unless it is filed under a ‘safe harbor’ provision similar to § 6020(a), a state income tax return that is filed late under the applicable rionbank-ruptcy state law is not a ‘…