THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

JUAN PEREZ, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Slappy, 522 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 1988)
  …692, rehearing denied, 326 U.S. 806, 66 S.Ct. 86, 90 L.Ed. 491 (1945); Martin v. Texas, 200 U.S. 316, 26 S.Ct. 338, 50 L.Ed. 497 (1906); State v. Jones, 485 So. 2d 1283 (Fla.1986); Pearson v. State, 514 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Floyd v. State, 511 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Blackshear; Kibler v. State, 501 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). This Court early had recognized the impossible burden imposed by Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 824, 13 L.Ed.2d 759, rehearing denied, 381 U.S. 921, 85 S.…
• Overstreet v. State, 712 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …deemed non-pretextual. See Daniel, 697 So. 2d at 960; Stroud v. State, 656 So. 2d 195, 196-97 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Givens v. State, 619 So. 2d 500, 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Richardson v. State, 575 So. 2d 294, 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Floyd v. State, 511 So. 2d 762, 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). It occurs to us from the record that the State was successful in camouflaging the pre-textual nature of its strike of Ms. Thomas only because of the lower court’s faulty recollection of the responses given during voir dire.…
• Foster v. State, 557 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …reason for its peremptory challenge of the third juror was obviously insufficient: a “feeling” about a juror does not satisfy the Neil test. Slappy, 522 So. 2d at 23; Reed v. State, 14 F.L.W. 298 (Fla. June 15, 1989); [*636] see also Floyd v. State, 511 So. 2d 762 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 545 So. 2d 1369 (Fla.1987). Furthermore, the prospective member’s marital status or occupation are not valid reasons unless those facts have some connection to the facts of the case, Reed; Slappy; Mayes v. State, 550 So…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Ginebra, 511 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 1987)
• Clement Lemmon Edwards v. State, 393 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)