CARLTON ADDERLY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARLTON ADDERLY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
511 So. 2d 766
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals both his convictions and his sentences. We affirm. However, on remand the trial court is directed to amend its sentencing order by adding a notation that the sentences were not imposed pursuant to the Guidelines and that, therefore, appellant is entitled to eligibility for parole. See Thrower v. State, 491 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and WEBSTER, PETER D., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moshe Tubero v. Chapnich, 552 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…eyed the court order, thus justifying the severe sanction of dismissal, although none of them directly conflict with Stoner. Championship Wrestling From Florida v. DeBlasio, 508 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Mittleman v. Rowe International, Inc., 511 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Cohn v. Nostalgia Realty, Inc., 516 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). In fact, in Championship Wrestling as well as Trupei v. City of [*934] Lighthouse Point, 506 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), this court imposed a requirement th…
-
Ross Dress FOR Less Va., Inc. v. Castro, 134 So. 3d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…. Thus, where sanctions such as these are being imposed for purportedly deliberate and contumacious conduct, the record must reflect a “refusal to obey” not just an inability to comply or confusion as to how to comply. Mittleman v. Rowe Int’l, Inc., 511 So. 2d 766, 768 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Garden-Aire Village Sea Haven, Inc. v. Decker, 433 So. 2d 676, 678 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (“When failure to comply with a court order is due to confusion or inability rather than gross indifference, a default ... should not be…
-
A Aaable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Able Bail Bond, Inc., 626 So. 2d 1105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)…itional sanction. The record does not establish that Aaable willfully refused to comply with the court order of March 10, 1993, or engaged in a “calculated effort to conceal or a conscious design to deceive the court.” Mittleman v. Rowe Int’l, Inc., 511 So. 2d 766, 767-68 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); cf. Zayres Dept. Stores v. Fingerhut, 383 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (good faith effort to comply, along with counsel’s confusion as to conditions of compliance, did not amount to willful failure to comply). We ther…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Thrower v. State, 491 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)