KELLY RENEE GISSENDANER, PETITIONER,

v.

HOMER BRYSON, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Jordan v. Ga. Dep't of Corr., 947 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2020)
• Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338 (U.S. 2016)
  …hs." Ibid. This Court granted certiorari to resolve the disagreement among Courts of Appeals over how to determine whether the application of an incorrect Guidelines range at sentencing affected the defendant's substantial rights. See 576 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 26, 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015). III The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stands generally apart from other Courts of Appeals with respect to its consideration of unpreserved Guidelines errors. This Court now holds that its approach is incorrect. No…
• Arthur v. Comm'r, Ala. Dep't OF Corr., Warden, 840 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …of set forth in Baze and Glossip apply to both facial and as-applied Eighth Amendment method-of-execution claims. See Gissendaner v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 803 F. 3d 565, 569 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Gissendaner v. Bryson, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 26, 192 L.Ed.2d 996 (2015) (“[T]here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but hot to as-applied challenges to them.”); see id. at 568-69 (holding that a…