DAVID ANTHONY TAYLOR, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• Molina-Martinez v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1338 (U.S. 2016)
  …s Court granted certiorari to resolve the disagreement among Courts of Appeals over how to determine whether the application of an incorrect Guidelines range at sentencing affected the defendant's substantial rights. See 576 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 26, 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015). III The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stands generally apart from other Courts of Appeals with respect to its consideration of unpreserved Guidelines errors. This Court now holds that its approach is incorrect. Nothing in the text…
• Arthur v. Comm'r, Ala. Dep't OF Corr., Warden, 840 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …of set forth in Baze and Glossip apply to both facial and as-applied Eighth Amendment method-of-execution claims. See Gissendaner v. Comm’r, Ga. Dep’t of Corr., 803 F. 3d 565, 569 (11th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Gissendaner v. Bryson, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 26, 192 L.Ed.2d 996 (2015) (“[T]here is no logical reason why there should be a readily available alternative requirement in facial challenges to lethal injection protocols but hot to as-applied challenges to them.”); see id. at 568-69 (holding that a…
• RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Community, 136 S. Ct. 2090 (U.S. 2016)
  …th United States v. Chao Fan Xu, 706 F.3d 965, 974-975 (C.A.9 2013)(holding that RICO does not apply extraterritorially; collecting cases). Because of this conflict and the importance of the issue, we granted certiorari. 576 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 28, 192 L.Ed.2d 998 (2015). II The question of RICO's extraterritorial application really involves two questions. First, do RICO's substantive prohibitions, contained in § 1962, apply to conduct that occurs in foreign countries? Second, does RICO's private right of a…