CHRISTOPHER RAY INGRAM, PETITIONER,
v.
FRANCES S. STEPHENSON.

U.S. | 2015-10-05
No. 14–9583.
136 S. Ct. 44 Supreme Court of the United States (2015) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 193 L. Ed. 2d 52
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ali Nejad v. Attorney Gen., State OF Ga., 830 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2016)
    …the Supreme Court] has on a set of materially indistinguishable facts.’ ” Jones v. GDCP Warden, 753 F. 3d 1171, 1182 (11th Cir. 2014) (alterations in original) (quoting Williams, 529 U.S. at 413, 120 S.Ct. 1495), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 43, 193 L.Ed.2d 52 (2015). “Under § 2254(d)(l)’s ‘unreasonable application’ clause, we grant relief only ‘if the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle from [the Supreme] Court’s decisions but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw