ABRAHAM CARRILLO-MORONES, PETITIONER,

v.

UNITED STATES.

Citator

Cited By

• In re Griffin, 823 F.3d 1350 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …Cir. 2015) (“[T]he the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law in Descamps. Rather, it clarified- — as a matter of statutory interpretation — application of the ACCA in light of existing precedent.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 256, 193 L.Ed.2d 212 (2015); In re Jackson, 776 F. 3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 2015) (“Nothing in Descamps indicates that its holding announced a new rule that was constitutionally based, and Descamps did not announce that its holding applied retroactively to…
• Mays v. United States, 817 F.3d 728 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …015) (“We hold that the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law in Descamps. Rather, it clarified — as a matter of statutory interpretation — application of the ACCA in light of existing precedent.”), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 136 S.Ct. 256, 193 L.Ed.2d 212 (2015); United States v. Davis, 751 F. 3d 769, 775 (6th Cir.2014) (“The Supreme Court in Descamps explained that it was not announcing a new rule, but was simply reaffirming” an existing approach.). Given Descamps did not announce…