REUBIN MARSH, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
PORTER S. BENNETT, M. S. MERRILL AND E. T. MERRILL, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1903-06-01
46 Fla. 241 Florida Supreme Court (1903) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the court upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thurston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325; Ropes v. Eldridge, 39 Fla. 47, 21. South. Rep. 570.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Reubin Marsh v. Porter S Bennett, 49 Fla. 186 (Fla. 1905)
    …he court and the plaintiff took a nonsuit. with bill of exceptions under section 1269 Revised Statutes of 1892. The cause was brought to this court by a writ of error which was dismissed as no final judgment appeared in the record. Marsh v. Bennett, 46 Fla. 241. 35 South. Rep. 336. A final judgment for the defendants was entered November 11th, 1904, and the plaintiff took a writ of error therefrom to the present term of this court. The bill of exceptions states that at the trial by the court, a jury having…
  • Morrison v. McCaskill, 46 Fla. 233 (Fla. 1903)
    …53, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. supra; 35 South. Rep. 982; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Co., 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. — ; Heinberg Brothers v. Thompson, 46 Fla. 242, 35 South. Rep. —; Marsh v. Bennett, 46 Fla. 241, 35 South. Rep. —. Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Shackleford, JJ., concur. Carter, P. J., and Maxwell and Cockrell, JJ., concur in the opinion.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw